ai-toolfinder
ENDE
Submit a tool

n8n alternatives: 8 tools compared (October 2026)

8 tools that do the same job as n8n. First a shortlist by situation, then prices, contract terms and switching costs, with all 8 in the table at the end.

22 min · · by

Leave n8n only if clients build workflows on your instance, you need paid features such as SSO at a lower price, or your own workflows are short. Activepieces is closest in how it counts (one run is one credit); Make, Zapier, Power Automate and Workato suit teams that want a hosted product or already live in one vendor's world. On October 5, 2026, the same four-step workflow at 10,000 runs a month listed at 50 euros on n8n Pro, 20 dollars on Activepieces Plus and 289 dollars on Zapier.

At a glance
  • n8n's Sustainable Use License allows internal business use and bars hosting n8n so that clients build workflows; n8n's own docs call it fair-code, not open source.
  • A trigger plus three actions is 1 execution on n8n, 1 credit on Activepieces, 4 credits on Make and 3 tasks on Zapier.
  • SSO, Git version control and shared projects are missing from the free Community edition; n8n lists them under Business at 667 euros a month billed annually, self-hosted only.
  • An annual n8n Cloud plan is paid 12 months in advance and is non-refundable; Enterprise contracts renew for 12 months unless written notice arrives 30 days before the end.
  • Workato prints no price on its pricing page (as of October 5, 2026).

On October 5, 2026 I read n8n's license file, license FAQ, pricing page, self-serve and enterprise terms, privacy documentation and sub-processor list, then the pricing pages, help articles and terms of five alternatives. 7 workflow automation tools carry a full profile in our directory; Activepieces is filed in a neighboring niche, which is why it joins them here.

The page does not rank the tools. Vendors count different things, so the price table uses one reference workflow, a trigger plus three actions without AI steps, at 1,000 and 10,000 runs a month. For a head-to-head on HR use cases, see n8n vs Zapier. Here the question is whether to leave n8n at all, and what that costs.

Shortlist: which n8n alternative fits which situation

Activepieces

A match for teams that want per-run billing like n8n's without per-step multiplication. A run is one credit however many steps it has, the cloud runs in Frankfurt, and the core is MIT licensed.

Make

Suits teams that want a hosted visual builder at a low entry price. Core lists from 9 dollars for 10,000 credits, and the data center is the EU or the US.

Zapier

Worth a look if you value the breadth of ready app connections (9,000+ apps according to its pricing page) and accept per-task billing. Professional starts at 19.99 dollars a month for 750 tasks, billed annually.

Microsoft Power Automate

Makes sense when you already license Microsoft products and prefer per-user pricing to per-run billing. Premium lists at 15 dollars per user a month, paid yearly.

Workato

Aimed at large organizations that buy integration platforms through sales. It runs an EU data center on AWS EU Central, and its price is not published by the vendor (as of October 5, 2026).

What one workflow costs at 1,000 and 10,000 runs

The vendors do not count the same thing. n8n's pricing page defines an execution as a single run of the entire workflow, whatever the number of steps. Zapier counts each successful action as a task and leaves the trigger out. Make counts a credit per module call, with the trigger check as one. Activepieces says a run is one credit however many steps it has. Power Automate prices licensed users and caps requests per day.

So I fixed one reference: a trigger and three actions, no AI steps, no filters. At 1,000 runs a month that is 1,000 n8n executions, 3,000 Zapier tasks and 4,000 Make credits. At 10,000 runs it is 10,000 executions, 30,000 tasks and 40,000 credits. The table lists the cheapest plan that covers each volume at list price. n8n Pro and Activepieces Plus sit exactly on their limits at 10,000, so a growing month needs the next tier or extra credits.

What this means for you: if your workflows have several steps, run-based units (n8n, Activepieces) stay flat while per-step units multiply; with one or two steps per run the gap shrinks. Count your own steps before you trust any headline price.

1execution on n8n for one run (trigger plus three actions)
1credit on Activepieces for the same run
4credits on Make: the trigger check and three module calls
3tasks on Zapier: three successful actions, the trigger is free

List prices, read October 5, 2026

Monthly list price for the same workflow

Reference workflow: one trigger and three actions, no AI steps. Sort by any column. Euros and dollars are shown as the vendors list them and are not converted.

ActivepiecesA credit: one run is one creditFree: 0 dollars (limit 1,000 credits)Plus: 20 dollars (10,000 credits), monthly billingCloud in Frankfurt, other regions on request, or your own servers
MakeA credit: one per module call, trigger check counts one (4 per run here)Core: from 9 dollars (10,000 credits cover 4,000)Needs 40,000 credits: the tier price is set on the vendor's sliderEU or US data center, fixed when the organization is created
n8n CloudAn execution: one whole run, any number of stepsStarter: 20 euros (limit 2,500 executions), billed annuallyPro: 50 euros (limit 10,000 executions), billed annuallyn8n Cloud or your own server (free Community edition)
Power AutomateA licensed user, with a request limit per dayPremium: 15 dollars per user, paid yearlyPremium: 15 dollars per user (my estimate: far below the 40,000 requests a user may make per 24 hours)Microsoft cloud, region set per environment
WorkatoNo public price listNot published by the vendor (as of October 5, 2026)Same as at 1,000 runsRegional data centers, among them the EU
ZapierA task: each successful action, not the trigger (3 per run here)Professional, 5,000 tasks: 89 dollars billed annually (133.50 monthly)Professional, 50,000 tasks: 289 dollars billed annually (433.50 monthly)Vendor-run cloud

Source: vendor pricing pages and help centers, read October 5, 2026; list prices without tax. Zapier tiers come from the plan data embedded in zapier.com/pricing.

Sources: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]

Stay or switch: three questions, then the evidence

Not everyone should leave. n8n's pricing page argues that its unit is the point: a workflow with ten steps costs the same as one with two. If that describes your workflows, the price argument favors n8n.

License. n8n's code sits under the Sustainable Use License, which n8n's docs call fair-code and distinguish from an open source license. The text permits use or modification only for your own internal business purposes or for non-commercial or personal use, and distribution only free of charge for non-commercial purposes. Files with .ee. in the name fall outside the license and need an Enterprise license.

What this means for you: if you build for your own company, or run client automations that only you edit, the license rarely forces a move. If clients configure workflows themselves, you need a commercial agreement with n8n or another product, and that is partly a legal question. Write to license@n8n.io before migrating.

Features. The free Community edition leaves out custom variables, environments, external secrets, external storage for binary data, log streaming, multi-main mode, projects, SSO (SAML and LDAP), sharing of workflows and credentials, and Git version control. Business adds them at 667 euros a month billed annually for 40,000 executions, self-hosted only, with a Cloud version on a waitlist. Pro at 50 euros has three shared projects but no SSO. Business targets companies under 100 employees.

What this means for you: a team that needs SSO and Git on n8n pays from 667 euros a month even at low volume. That jump is where Activepieces Team (200 dollars, SSO included) or Zapier Team (from 69 dollars, SAML SSO) start to look cheaper, with different limits and units.

Data. On n8n Cloud, the pricing FAQ says data stays in the EU, in Frankfurt. The sub-processor list, updated September 22, 2026, names Microsoft Azure in the EU, for example Germany and Sweden, and lists AI providers such as OpenAI and Anthropic with processing in the US. The two documents do not name the same places. Self-hosting takes n8n out of the processor chain, but telemetry is on by default (counts, no execution data) and paid license keys report production execution counts to n8n daily.

What this means for you: if GDPR is your reason to leave, check first whether the gap sits in the AI features' sub-processors rather than in the workflow engine. Switching tools moves the question to another processor list.

Try it

Stay on n8n or switch?

Three yes or no questions. The result is a starting point, not a purchase recommendation and not legal advice.

Do people outside your company, such as customers or clients, build or edit workflows on your n8n instance, or will they?

Not allowed under the community license (license FAQ):

  • Hosting n8n as a service and letting clients build workflows
  • Letting external end users build or configure their own workflows through your productvia a custom UI, the n8n API, MCP or an AI agent acting for the user
  • Forking n8n's code to launch your own automation product
  • White-labeling n8n by removing its branding and offering it as is
  • Using enterprise features that ask for a license key without an Enterprise license

Sources: [1][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][5][2]

The five alternatives, and who each one is not for

Activepieces keeps both of n8n's traits, a self-hostable core and a run-based unit. Its docs say the core is MIT licensed and enterprise features sit under a commercial license, which matches the repository's LICENSE file. Free gives 1,000 credits a month, Plus is 20 dollars flat for 10,000 credits and up to 5 users, Team is 200 dollars for 50,000 credits and 25 users, and extra credits cost 0.007 dollars each. AI steps cost 2, 10 or 20 credits by model tier unless you bring your own keys. The pricing table says Free credits reset daily, the FAQ says monthly, so I treat 1,000 a month as the ceiling. The vendor writes that its SOC 2 program is in progress. Teams that must hand a customer an audit report this quarter should look elsewhere.

Make counts credits. Its help center says one operation is one credit, and a trigger counts once per check however many bundles it returns, while later modules run once per bundle. A scenario that reads ten new rows therefore spends one credit on the trigger and ten per later module. The pricing page lists Free with 1,000 credits, then Core from 9 dollars, Pro from 16 and Teams from 29 at the 10,000-credit tier, with a slider up to 8 million credits. US or EU is chosen when the organization is created and cannot be changed later. If you need it on your own servers, it will not do: the help center names only those two data centers.

Zapier counts successful actions only, so filters, paths and failed steps cost nothing. Professional runs from 19.99 dollars for 750 tasks to 289 dollars for 50,000, billed annually, and Team from 69 dollars adds 25 users and SAML SSO. Long workflows at volume are the weak spot: my reference run costs three tasks, so 10,000 runs land on the 50,000-task tier at 289 dollars, against 50 euros on n8n Pro.

Power Automate prices people and bots. Premium is 15 dollars per user a month paid yearly, an unattended Process bot 150 dollars, a hosted one 215 dollars, and a 30-day trial exists. Microsoft says listed prices are for marketing purposes only. A Premium user may make 40,000 requests per 24 hours, a Process license 250,000. An environment created in the EU or EFTA keeps data in the EU Data Boundary. Anyone who wants one all-in monthly figure will be disappointed, because user, bot and add-on prices stack.

Workato's pricing page prints no amount and sends you to a demo. Its docs list data centers in the US (AWS US East), the EU (AWS EU Central, for customers in the EEA who prefer local storage), Japan and Singapore. Small teams that need a price before a sales call will not get one.

What this means for you: per-run billing and self-hosting point to Activepieces, a low-priced hosted builder to Make, breadth of app connections to Zapier, a Microsoft estate to Power Automate, and sales-led enterprise governance to Workato.

Sources: [2][17][16][18][4][19][3][5][6][7][8][20][9][21]

What leaving costs: terms, cancellation, export, deletion

I read each vendor's terms on October 5, 2026. n8n's Self-Serve Terms (last updated August 28, 2026) let you cancel a monthly plan at any time and keep access to the end of the month. An annual plan is paid 12 months in advance and is non-refundable. Customer content is usually deleted six months after deactivation, with an email 30 days before. n8n gives no pro-rata refunds on Business.

Enterprise customers sign the Master Enterprise Terms (version 08.2026). The term comes from the order form and then renews automatically for 12 months at n8n's then-current list price, unless one side gives written notice at least 30 days before the end. Export is the easy part: workflows are JSON, downloadable from the editor or movable with the n8n CLI. The files carry credential names and IDs, so plan to re-create the connections. On a self-hosted instance you delete user data yourself.

What this means for you: the notice period is rarely the expensive part. Paying two tools while you rebuild is, plus re-creating credentials. Annual n8n and Zapier plans are paid in advance, so a mid-term switch means paying twice. Time the move to the renewal date.

What the other vendors' own pages say about leaving (read October 5, 2026):

  • Activepieces: plans change at any time, downgrades apply at the end of the billing periodIts terms page showed 'This document is not available right now' on October 5, 2026.
  • Make: cancel any time, the plan runs to the end of the billing cycle, then the account drops to FreeUnused credits do not move to the Free plan. Help page updated August 31, 2026. Scenarios export as blueprints in JSON.
  • Zapier: fees are non-refundable and the plan renews automatically unless you cancel before the renewal dateTerms in force from April 9, 2026. A cancelled plan converts to Free at term end, a deleted account cannot be restored, and an email or chat request to cancel does not count.
  • Power Automate: plans are listed as paid yearlyContract terms depend on your Microsoft agreement and are not on the pricing page. Flows export as .zip packages, only by the owner or a co-owner.
  • Workato: the pricing page names no term, no notice period and no priceNot published by the vendor (as of October 5, 2026); the contract comes through sales.
March 17, 2022n8n moves from Apache 2.0 with Commons Clause to the Sustainable Use License.
April 9, 2026Zapier's current Terms of Service take effect (posted April 8).
August 27, 2026Zapier's updated Data Processing Addendum takes effect.
August 28, 2026n8n's Self-Serve Terms are last updated; the Master Enterprise Terms carry version 08.2026.
August 31, 2026Make updates its help page on cancelling a subscription.
September 22, 2026n8n updates its sub-processor list.

Contract documents named on this page, with their own dates.

Checklist before you move off n8n

0/8

Your progress stays saved in this browser.

Sources: [22][23][24][14][1][25][26][27][28][2][9]

Corrections, contradictions and what I left out

I corrected two entries in our own data. Our Activepieces profile listed SOC 2 Type II; the vendor's pricing page says the program is in progress and that it will not claim a certification it does not hold, so the entry is wrong. Our n8n entry marks SSO as an enterprise-only feature, while the pricing page lists SSO, SAML and LDAP under Business as well.

Two sources disagreed. n8n names Frankfurt for Cloud data in one place and Azure in Germany and Sweden in another. Activepieces describes Free credits as resetting daily in its table and monthly in its FAQ.

I left out review-site complaints and community threads, because they are not primary sources, and I did not cost Make at 10,000 runs, because its higher tiers sit behind a slider. In our data, 4 of the 7 tools in the main niche list an EU hosting option; that is a hint, and each vendor's own page decides.

Sources: [2][1][15][3]

Sources

  1. n8n pricing page
  2. Activepieces pricing page
  3. Make pricing page
  4. Make help center: Operations
  5. Zapier pricing page
  6. Zapier help: How is task usage measured
  7. Power Automate pricing page
  8. Microsoft Learn: Requests limits and allocations
  9. Workato pricing page
  10. n8n LICENSE.md (Sustainable Use License)
  11. n8n docs: Community license
  12. n8n docs: License FAQ
  13. n8n docs: Compare editions
  14. n8n docs: Privacy
  15. n8n sub-processors
  16. Activepieces LICENSE file
  17. Activepieces docs: License
  18. Make help center: Credits
  19. Make help center: Organizations
  20. Microsoft Learn: Choose the region for an environment
  21. Workato docs: Data centers
  22. n8n Self-Serve Terms
  23. n8n Master Enterprise Terms
  24. n8n docs: Export and import workflows
  25. Zapier Terms of Service
  26. Make help center: Cancel your subscription
  27. Make help center: Scenario blueprints
  28. Microsoft Learn: Export and import a non-solution flow
Nick Schaefer, HR Interim Manager & AI Consultant
· LinkedIn

Why teams look beyond n8n

  • 2 alternatives are strong in at least one of the same countries as n8n, so local support and compliance should be comparable.

n8n and the top 3 alternatives at a glance

Open in the comparison tool →
n8n compared with Make, Zapier and Microsoft Power Automate
n8nMakeZapierMicrosoft Power Automate
PricingUsage-basedFreemiumFreemiumPer user
Free planYesYesYesNo
Free trialYesNoYesYes
Data hostingGermanyMultiple regions, EU region availableUnited StatesMultiple regions, EU region available
Strong inGermanyCzechiaUnited StatesUnited States, Germany, Canada
Company sizeSmall, Midsize, EnterpriseSmall, Midsize, EnterpriseSmall, Midsize, EnterpriseSmall, Midsize, Enterprise
CertificationsSOC 2, SOC 3ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type II

All 8 alternatives to n8n

Questions about n8n alternatives

Is n8n open source?

n8n's docs describe the Sustainable Use License as fair-code and say n8n does not use an open source license. The source code is visible on GitHub and you may self-host it for your own internal business use, but redistribution and hosting it as a service for clients are restricted.

How many executions do I need on n8n?

n8n's pricing page gives a rule of thumb: a daily schedule is about 30 or 31 executions a month, a schedule that runs every 5 minutes is about 8,600 to 8,900. A webhook workflow equals the number of events it receives.

Can I run n8n for several clients?

Yes, under conditions. The license FAQ allows automations for clients on your instance as long as the clients cannot create or edit them, and it allows charging for setup, maintenance, training and consulting. It does not allow giving clients their own workflow building through your product.

What is the best alternative to n8n?

It depends on your country and company size. In our data, Make, Zapier and Microsoft Power Automate share the most strong markets with n8n, so they are the closest fit if you work where n8n is strong. Filter the list by country and size to narrow it down.

Is there a free alternative to n8n?

Make, Zapier, Microsoft Power Automate, Workato and DingTalk offer a free plan or a free trial according to the vendors. Check the limits of free plans before you rely on them for employee data.

Which n8n alternatives can host data in the EU?

Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Workato and Lintelly can store customer data in the EU, according to the vendors. Ask for the data processing agreement (Art. 28 GDPR) and the list of subprocessors.

Back to the n8n profile →